When The World Ends: The World of Walt Disney’s ‘Citizen Kane’ is Gone

When Walt Disney released his first film, Citizen Kane in 1915, he didn’t think much of it.

A film set in a small New York town during the Great Depression, it was a flop, he admitted.

And he didn and still isn’t fond of its main character, “The Great Dane.”

But the film, released in 1928, helped create the modern blockbuster.

It won the Academy Award for best picture that year for its sensational opening scene, where a small group of actors are shot in a crowded theater.

It went on to gross over $300 million worldwide.

The movie spawned several sequels, including another in 1937, and an original story about the adventures of a New York detective named Kane (played by Charles Laughton).

It’s the subject of a new documentary by IGN, Citizen Kanes, premiering on August 5.

Watch: What’s in a name?

Citizen Kane is one of the most recognizable names in cinema history.

But the original movie is largely unknown, thanks to its controversial opening sequence, a sequence that featured a large group of people shot, many of them unconscious.

It became a movie classic, and its fans loved to dissect it on Twitter.

Disney’s reaction to the movie wasn’t what many expected.

After all, he’d made the movie in 1928 and had already had a successful career with his other movies.

So he had plenty of time to make a sequel.

The first version of the film was called The Great Dane, and the director had just released the first part of it as Citizen Kane.

It was the same film, of course, and in the film’s original script, the Great Dane is an Irishman who goes missing in 1916 while hunting for a runaway German spy.

But in the movie version, the character was a German spy and the main antagonist.

That led to an outcry on Twitter, and people began to call the movie “Kanegate.”

The backlash was not confined to fans of the original film.

Some critics called it an insult to the memory of the Great Danes.

In 1928, Disney’s first major movie, Alice in Wonderland, was released.

It starred an unknown actress as Alice, and was released with a trailer that included scenes of a group of women in a group sex act with a man.

The film earned more than $800 million worldwide, including $200 million in box office receipts.

“Alice in Wonderland was one of those movies that had been planned by an executive,” said writer and filmmaker Scott Neustadter.

“There were no women in it, and it had nothing to do with the Great Men and Women of the World.

It had to do it with a little girl and a cat.

It made no sense.

It didn’t belong in the public domain.”

“Citizen Kanes” is about the history of the opening sequence of Citizen Kane and the backlash it sparked.

Watch the trailer for “Citizens Kane” on IGN: WATCH: What you need to know about “Crimson Peak” Watch the full trailer for Citizen Kans on IGN’s website.

“Kanes” has been referenced by a lot of people in the past, and has even inspired a sequel, which has yet to be announced.

But it’s not all bad.

It’s just one of many films that have been linked to the film.

The opening sequence itself is not a huge deal, Neustar said.

It may be the most famous of all time.

But most people don’t know that.

“The story of the Citizen Kane opening is the story of one of my favorite movies of all-time,” Neustads said.

“It’s the story about a young boy named Kane, and he has an old friend, who happens to be an Irish-American.”

“Kans” is one example of how Hollywood can continue to tell a story that people actually want to see.

“If you go back and look at a lot, there’s a lot that is connected to this film,” Neostadts said.

There are the characters, the locations, the music, and even the plot.

But even as the film becomes more and more famous, there are a lot more people who have forgotten about the movie, which is why the filmmakers decided to re-imagine the story to give the film a new context.

“We’re really trying to change the conversation, to retell it,” Neastadts explained.

“This is a movie that is still so relevant today, and we really wanted to make sure we were taking care of that and keeping it relevant.

We wanted to show that it was still a big part of our culture.”

“I think that when we re-tell the story, I think we will be doing it in a way that is really different from the original,” Neuster said.

You’ll see it on the big screen again in 2019 with “The Fate of